Ask to join →

Membership is free, and members decide the Initiative's direction by vote.

Big problems are rarely planned for in public

Species-level problems are often treated as too large or too political to plan for outside government, and talk of using AI on them seldom produces published work anyone can check. The Initiative has AI models draft a plan for each problem; subject-matter experts then test and correct it so that citizens and leaders can put it into practice.

Thirteen plans, current as of September 2026

Each plan sets out what would work, checks it against this year's events and ranks what to do first. The plans and essays cite 647 sources between them. Findings the plans build on:

The Big Four · Nine more · The NHI factor

First drafts finished, expert review under way

The first versions of all thirteen plans and four essays are published, and none has been put into practice yet. Subject-matter experts have been consulted, and the first round of their feedback is awaited. Each plan will be revised as that feedback arrives and as events change, with a new version number each time so you can see what changed and when.

If non-human intelligence were confirmed

The Initiative treats non-human intelligence as a low-probability, high-impact case. If its presence were confirmed, or contact became possible as technology advances, parts of the other plans would change, and almost no one is working out how. Three essays sort the public claims by how many sources agree and trace the practical consequences.

Read the NHI analysis →

Help check a plan and carry it out

Tell us who you are and which plans interest you. Requests are usually approved within a day or two, and you then receive an email to set your password. Your first sign-in starts a guided tour of the collaboration platform, and a member of the onboarding team arranges a voice call with you at a time that suits you.

↑